A young woman, just 18, invited her boyfriend of three months to move into her apartment, keeping one key detail to herself—she was the owner of the entire two-story building and rented out the lower floor. When her boyfriend eventually discovered this, his reaction was far from what she expected.

She had inherited the property from her father and, rather than live extravagantly, she used it to generate passive income. She rented the lower floor for $500 a month while living on the second floor. Considering the property’s location—an hour from the city and 15 minutes from the nearest store—she felt the rent was fair, even though a similar space could easily go for $600 to $700.

Her boyfriend had been struggling with his living arrangements and didn’t want to move back in with his parents. Out of support and care, she invited him to stay with her. They split grocery costs, but she didn’t ask him to contribute to rent or utilities, feeling her financial decisions were personal and didn’t need to be shared right away.

For three months, things went smoothly. However, one day, their tenant knocked on the door to report a broken freezer. The woman went downstairs to help, and her boyfriend overheard their conversation.

When she returned, he asked for an update. She casually explained that the tenant would be buying a new freezer, and she would reimburse her. Surprised, he asked why she was responsible. Her simple response: “Because I’m the landlord.”

Her boyfriend’s reaction was immediate and unexpected. He became angry, accusing her of hiding the truth. He ranted about landlords, claiming they only care about money, and called her manipulative for not telling him sooner. He even demanded that she give him half of the rent she collected from the tenant.

His reasoning? “If you’re not doing it just for the money, you should have no problem sharing it with me,” he argued. The demand shocked her, especially since he had previously criticized landlords for being greedy.

The argument escalated, with him giving her the silent treatment and eventually threatening to tell her friends. When she refused to meet his demands, he became aggressive, even attempting to punch a hole in the wall.

At that point, she realized the relationship was over. She called her father, who came over and waited outside while she tried to talk things through with her boyfriend. But the conversation only made things worse. He lashed out again, telling her he regretted ever meeting her before storming out, saying he never wanted to see her again.

After the confrontation, she made the difficult decision to end the relationship. Reflecting on what had happened, she realized she didn’t need someone who would react with such entitlement and hostility. Concerned for her safety, some Reddit users suggested she change the locks in case her ex-boyfriend still had access to her home.

In the end, she stood her ground, refusing to let someone take advantage of her or her property. She prioritized her well-being over a toxic relationship, showing strength and independence.

Do you think she was right to refuse his demands? How would you have handled the situation?